Saturday, April 5, 2008

Rose 2a

Well, the numbering is going to be a little weird (obviously). Because I decided to include the first drawing which was not going to be part of the series, but on second thought, it was part of the series. So this is really the third, but it is labeled the second. Oh, the misery of keeping things that are evolving straight. It is not really necessary. The next rose, labeled 3 . . . (really number 4) will put the numbering straight. Until somewhere around twenty when I did an abstraction and was mad and refused to give it a number. Whatever. Maybe that is what I should do . . . make the point that the numbers, for reference will have some deviations, but I will do the best I can.

No comments: